Preserve Download Modification Timestamp, I would assume differences of about 5% or less would be fairly negligible.ĮQuake Alert (menu bug, always transparent, happens in 32-bit Firefox also),
Waterfox 64 bit download software#
If you want to see performance differences objectively, without any political bias, do your own tests, with a stop watch, or with software profilers that can give microsecond or nanosecond accuracy of the time it takes to perform certain functions like page renders. They may work, have bugs, or not work, only one way to find out if it's right for you. If your plugins or addons are not listed, try it and see.
There's little or no excuse to spread fear, uncertainty or doubt about using 64-bit Firefox, either compatibility or performance wise. I notice absolutely no problems with any of my addons or plugins, which probably represents everything the average user could ever want. Occasional app restarts are still necessary due to severe memory leaks (regardless of build). In this condition, the 64-bit build suffers much less system slowdown (for a while), but eventually both will begin to bog down the system when a few dozen tabs are open and the browser is left running for a month or more. One of the main advantages is that if I have a few hundred tabs open (which I do more often than you'd imagine), the 64-bit browser can allocate the RAM, whereas the 32-bit browser can not. I believe it is a good-faith project that does what it says, nothing more.
I have not detected any virus or malware of any kind. I have used Waterfox under Windows 7 for about the past 4 months with no problems.
0 kommentar(er)
